Comments on: 100 reasons why Anthropogenic Global Warming is a cult

By: Wayne from At The Water Cooler

Wayne from At The Water Cooler — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 17:10:53 +0000

Added a referenced to your post from (Isms) category from At The Water Cooler

By: 100 reasons why Anthropogenic Global Warming is a cult « The Invisible Opportunity: Hidden Truths Revealed

Wed, 03 Mar 2010 13:18:31 +0000

[...] See the rest here 100 reasons why Anthropogenic Global Warming is a cult | CLIMATEGATE. [...]

By: John W.

John W. — Tue, 02 Mar 2010 23:40:30 +0000

If you carry on chopping down rainforests then of course CO2 will rise. The rainforests are the lungs of the planet. I speculate that one of the main reasons for CO2 increasing rapidly is because of the rapid increase in deforestation.

It therefore makes perfect sense that if you replant as you chop down the net effect will be zero.

Trouble is that just is not happening and we are chopping down quicker than we are replanting

By: John W.

John W. — Tue, 02 Mar 2010 23:28:36 +0000

How about paying people in poorer countries to plant trees instead of chopping them down. That would cut the CO2 problem.
I’m certain that if agriculture were managed properly in this way, then the likes of Mr Gore, who says he also invented the internet, would not have any argument.

(I wonder what Mr Tim Berners-Lee thought of Gore’s comments)

By: Graham

Graham — Tue, 02 Mar 2010 22:21:40 +0000

mel64d – I took a look and when I saw mention of the Club of Rome, then I’d have to say I don’t disagree with you. What that is exactly has always been a concern.

By: mel64d

mel64d — Tue, 02 Mar 2010 21:49:47 +0000

…this is what it is all about with these people…please take a look and see for yourself!! http://www.green-agenda.com/globalrevolution.html

By: John W.

John W. — Tue, 02 Mar 2010 11:08:26 +0000

I know I saw it. Once upon a time Bill was a promising computer geek who was not very good at programming according to his Microshaft colleagues. Now he is telling us that we all have to have an injection an die. What a waste of a brain. Having said that i’m all for renewable energy, solar, hydro, wind, tidal etc. that makes sense but the CO2 argument is somewhat precarious and based on dodgy science. It would be great if solar cells were cheap enough to put on everybody’s roof, but have you seen the price of them?

By: John W.

John W. — Tue, 02 Mar 2010 10:56:36 +0000

Just in case Al Gore fails in his mass suicide bid and that of his his followers.

We here at “Death-Right Inc (The experts choice)” would hereby like to offer our services to do it for them. Free of charge of course.

We offer a choice of death to these idiots, lethal injection although it might take a while to get round all of the idiots who believe this nonsense. Needles & syringes supplied FREE !!!!!

We offer an express option of being burnt to death or drowned. The advantage here is that many advocates can be dealt with in one go. Clean safe and humane – (unless you’re an advocate)

The latest option – lethal electrocution, using state of the art technology. Many advocates can be wired up in parallel for maximum current consumption. It really is fun to watch their eyeballs boil, well worth watching. We can also wire them up in series but it does take longer and costs a little more, due to the higher voltages requires.

We apologise to the neighbours if the lights go a bit dim, and the telly flickers a bit, whilst this occurs though and normal service will be resumed as quickly as possible.

Call now for an immediate quote, please state how many advocates will be attending as we may have to buy thicker wire and a bigger generator.

All corpses are disposed of in an eco-friendly way according to local environmental policy, where possible, the remains of corpses are recycled into door mats, tyres, plastics, trash bins, toilets etc.

Death-Right Inc (The experts choice) call +44-111-111-111-1111

****************************************************

Perhaps then and only then the junk science will go away. Everyone now knows about the 800 year time lag between CO2 levels and temperature and that it is temperature that leads CO2 and not the other way around. If 0.037% of the atmosphere is CO2 and is so important then stop cutting down the rain forest that is the single biggest thing that we could do to cut CO2. The only problem then would be is how do we replace income of the poor countries who are the ones cutting down the rain forest. Plant more green stuff that will reduce CO2 – CO2 is plant food for God’s sake.

Then we can all be normal again, go home and have some tea

By: Tel

Tel — Tue, 02 Mar 2010 07:18:53 +0000

Sadly, looks like #100 has been affirmed after the Francisco Lotero and Miriam Coletti story. Hopefully, there are no cases of people driven to suicide by being too skeptical.

By: Fouad

Fouad — Tue, 02 Mar 2010 01:49:35 +0000

Here is a speech by Bill Gates on global warming.

http://www.ted.com/talks/bill_gates.html