<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IPCC propaganda, half truths, bogus science, urban legends about methane</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.climategate.com/agw-propaganda-half-truths-bogus-science-urban-legends-methane/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.climategate.com/agw-propaganda-half-truths-bogus-science-urban-legends-methane</link>
	<description>Anthropogenic Global Warming, history&#039;s biggest scam</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:21:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DougS</title>
		<link>http://www.climategate.com/agw-propaganda-half-truths-bogus-science-urban-legends-methane/comment-page-1#comment-6448</link>
		<dc:creator>DougS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 12:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climategate.com/?p=5674#comment-6448</guid>
		<description>The IPCC doesn&#039;t mention the actual concentration in the atmosphere - 150% of absolutely minuscule is still negligible.

I watched a debate on BBC&#039;s Sunday morning show (28 Feb. 2010) &quot;The Big Questions&quot; about whether we should all be turning vegetarian to save the planet!
Interestingly, not a single voice on either side of the debate questioned that eating meat was destroying the planet. Many didn&#039;t want to give up meat but they conceded that it was a bad thing to do.

I believe it shows that, because of lack of coverage in the MSM, the majority of the public have not been exposed to the sceptical viewpoint, anti-AGW evidence and that &#039;Climategate&#039; and all the other &#039;...Gates&#039; have simply passed them by.

It&#039;s going to be a long, hard slog!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The IPCC doesn&#8217;t mention the actual concentration in the atmosphere &#8211; 150% of absolutely minuscule is still negligible.</p>
<p>I watched a debate on BBC&#8217;s Sunday morning show (28 Feb. 2010) &#8220;The Big Questions&#8221; about whether we should all be turning vegetarian to save the planet!<br />
Interestingly, not a single voice on either side of the debate questioned that eating meat was destroying the planet. Many didn&#8217;t want to give up meat but they conceded that it was a bad thing to do.</p>
<p>I believe it shows that, because of lack of coverage in the MSM, the majority of the public have not been exposed to the sceptical viewpoint, anti-AGW evidence and that &#8216;Climategate&#8217; and all the other &#8216;&#8230;Gates&#8217; have simply passed them by.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s going to be a long, hard slog!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/12 queries in 0.005 seconds using disk
Object Caching 380/429 objects using disk

Served from: www.climategate.com @ 2012-02-08 23:23:16 -->
