Comments on: …and the beat goes on, the beat goes on

By: Dominic

Dominic — Wed, 24 Feb 2010 22:33:08 +0000

Do you have your tin foil hat on? That’s the only way to stop them from controlling your thoughts.

By: kramer

kramer — Wed, 24 Feb 2010 20:20:13 +0000

I think AGW is being used to implement most of the unfinished goals of the New International Economic Order that fizzled out in the 80′s.

By: PaulsNZ

PaulsNZ — Wed, 24 Feb 2010 19:15:22 +0000

I wouldn’t laugh at a madman with a gun to my head!.. These bureaucrats have HUGE BETS (Investments) in the Con game and they will do all in their power to get it into LAW. VERY dangerous!.

By: Graham

Graham — Wed, 24 Feb 2010 19:06:38 +0000

Thanks for raising methane Dominic. It’s not polite to do so in company, but I forgive you.

I was planning a post about the subject.

I’ll let you wait for it, but it basically strongly suggests that methane is – a lot of hot air. By the way it’s from a scientific study.

I don’t put it in definite terms because climate isn’t like that. There are too many unknown factors and comples inter actions.

By: mel

mel — Wed, 24 Feb 2010 18:47:21 +0000

The best problem to work on is a non-existent one. With a non problem everybody can be a hero, deluded people work well together and all analysis always shows that the non problem is a problem. The non problem gets recycled around and around and more non problems spin off creating new non problem opportunities.

By: mel64d

mel64d — Wed, 24 Feb 2010 17:49:09 +0000

It’s not a problem either….

By: Dominic

Dominic — Wed, 24 Feb 2010 17:07:03 +0000

“They’re planning not only one, but now three conferences to try and figure out a new way to say the sky is falling. What will it be? Methane Gas”

AS I HAVE POINTED OUT REPEATEDLY ON THIS BLOG ALREADY, METHANE GAS FEEDBACK IS NOT A NEW IDEA.

In fact it took me only 5 minutes to find a paper on it from 1987.

Do the bloggers here bother to do ANY fact checking before they go off spouting whatever sounds good to them?