<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BBC to investigate itself on climate change bias</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.climategate.com/bbc-to-investigate-itself-over-climate-change-bias/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.climategate.com/bbc-to-investigate-itself-over-climate-change-bias</link>
	<description>Anthropogenic Global Warming, history&#039;s biggest scam</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:21:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.climategate.com/bbc-to-investigate-itself-over-climate-change-bias/comment-page-1#comment-782</link>
		<dc:creator>David Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 22:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climategate.com/?p=1563#comment-782</guid>
		<description>Perhaps New Scientist and Nature could usefully hold similar inquiries!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps New Scientist and Nature could usefully hold similar inquiries!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Keough</title>
		<link>http://www.climategate.com/bbc-to-investigate-itself-over-climate-change-bias/comment-page-1#comment-762</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Keough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 20:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climategate.com/?p=1563#comment-762</guid>
		<description>Thanks, John.  Actually, I&#039;ve been stoking the stove all day.  Reality demands it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, John.  Actually, I&#8217;ve been stoking the stove all day.  Reality demands it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JOHN</title>
		<link>http://www.climategate.com/bbc-to-investigate-itself-over-climate-change-bias/comment-page-1#comment-760</link>
		<dc:creator>JOHN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 20:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climategate.com/?p=1563#comment-760</guid>
		<description>With global warming  you don&#039;t need a hot stove! (Even though it&#039;s -50 in the midwest).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With global warming  you don&#8217;t need a hot stove! (Even though it&#8217;s -50 in the midwest).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Keough</title>
		<link>http://www.climategate.com/bbc-to-investigate-itself-over-climate-change-bias/comment-page-1#comment-755</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Keough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 19:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climategate.com/?p=1563#comment-755</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not going to sit on a hot stove waiting for this to happen!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not going to sit on a hot stove waiting for this to happen!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Ashton</title>
		<link>http://www.climategate.com/bbc-to-investigate-itself-over-climate-change-bias/comment-page-1#comment-748</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Ashton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 16:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climategate.com/?p=1563#comment-748</guid>
		<description>That the BBC Trust is to run this review is risible. 

After all the Trust was complicit in the report “From Seesaw to Wagon Wheel-Safeguarding Impartiality in the 21st Century” (published June 2007) which said ‘There may be now a broad scientific consensus that climate change is definitely happening and that it is at least predominantly man-made… the weight of evidence no longer justifies equal space being given to the opponents of the consensus’. 

This has driven BBC policy on covering climate change for the last two-and-a-half-years. For the Trust to now investigate its own policy is akin to the Gamekeeper investigating his own beaters. 

In short, this review will be no better than the whitewashes which have posed as enquiries into the Iraq War!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That the BBC Trust is to run this review is risible. </p>
<p>After all the Trust was complicit in the report “From Seesaw to Wagon Wheel-Safeguarding Impartiality in the 21st Century” (published June 2007) which said ‘There may be now a broad scientific consensus that climate change is definitely happening and that it is at least predominantly man-made… the weight of evidence no longer justifies equal space being given to the opponents of the consensus’. </p>
<p>This has driven BBC policy on covering climate change for the last two-and-a-half-years. For the Trust to now investigate its own policy is akin to the Gamekeeper investigating his own beaters. </p>
<p>In short, this review will be no better than the whitewashes which have posed as enquiries into the Iraq War!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Mabbs</title>
		<link>http://www.climategate.com/bbc-to-investigate-itself-over-climate-change-bias/comment-page-1#comment-740</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Mabbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 14:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climategate.com/?p=1563#comment-740</guid>
		<description>Totally agree ADE - the issue is being given the &#039;Humphrey Appleby&#039; treatment - call an internal inquiry, drag your feet over the outcome (I wonder what that will be ?) then when the result emerges it will be too late. Gerald Warner has had enough along
with James Delingpole. Neither of them will be voting for any of the big 3 parties. (Even for &#039;smug Dave&#039; who reminds me of Gore.)
Check out these 2 blogs.

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/geraldwarner/100021526/climate-science-is-an-oxymoron-time-for-zero-tolerance-of-green-agendas/

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100021577/the-greatest-threat-of-the-21st-century-not-agw-but-eco-fascism/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree ADE &#8211; the issue is being given the &#8216;Humphrey Appleby&#8217; treatment &#8211; call an internal inquiry, drag your feet over the outcome (I wonder what that will be ?) then when the result emerges it will be too late. Gerald Warner has had enough along<br />
with James Delingpole. Neither of them will be voting for any of the big 3 parties. (Even for &#8216;smug Dave&#8217; who reminds me of Gore.)<br />
Check out these 2 blogs.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/geraldwarner/100021526/climate-science-is-an-oxymoron-time-for-zero-tolerance-of-green-agendas/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/geraldwarner/100021526/climate-science-is-an-oxymoron-time-for-zero-tolerance-of-green-agendas/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100021577/the-greatest-threat-of-the-21st-century-not-agw-but-eco-fascism/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100021577/the-greatest-threat-of-the-21st-century-not-agw-but-eco-fascism/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BBC To Investigate The BBC Over Climate Change Propaganda &#171; The Tory Aardvark&#39;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.climategate.com/bbc-to-investigate-itself-over-climate-change-bias/comment-page-1#comment-737</link>
		<dc:creator>BBC To Investigate The BBC Over Climate Change Propaganda &#171; The Tory Aardvark&#39;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 13:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climategate.com/?p=1563#comment-737</guid>
		<description>[...] But we’re certain Mr. Gore was already on the top of the BBC’s list of candidates. more at Climategate.com Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)The BBC Preaches Climate Change In The Day Of The [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But we’re certain Mr. Gore was already on the top of the BBC’s list of candidates. more at Climategate.com Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)The BBC Preaches Climate Change In The Day Of The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ADE</title>
		<link>http://www.climategate.com/bbc-to-investigate-itself-over-climate-change-bias/comment-page-1#comment-717</link>
		<dc:creator>ADE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 05:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climategate.com/?p=1563#comment-717</guid>
		<description>Problem is the enquiry will not report until 2011,by which time stupids will have signed up to pay the climate taxes.
           It is looking into &quot;bias&quot; not &quot;truth&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Problem is the enquiry will not report until 2011,by which time stupids will have signed up to pay the climate taxes.<br />
           It is looking into &#8220;bias&#8221; not &#8220;truth&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ayrdale</title>
		<link>http://www.climategate.com/bbc-to-investigate-itself-over-climate-change-bias/comment-page-1#comment-695</link>
		<dc:creator>Ayrdale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 02:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climategate.com/?p=1563#comment-695</guid>
		<description>Whatever the outcome of the BBC navel gazing things will never be the same for the hypocrites, hysterics and liars of the AGW movement. Their mantra used to be that the science was settled, and the Beeb could then justify any excess it chose to run with. No more...

The red/green left have staked all on this game and they&#039;re losing big time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever the outcome of the BBC navel gazing things will never be the same for the hypocrites, hysterics and liars of the AGW movement. Their mantra used to be that the science was settled, and the Beeb could then justify any excess it chose to run with. No more&#8230;</p>
<p>The red/green left have staked all on this game and they&#8217;re losing big time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wesley Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.climategate.com/bbc-to-investigate-itself-over-climate-change-bias/comment-page-1#comment-692</link>
		<dc:creator>Wesley Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 02:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climategate.com/?p=1563#comment-692</guid>
		<description>Nice one but will it be a cover-up or not? The elections coming, labours likely to loose. The BBC will face a Conservative parliament that&#039;s just looking for an excuse to take the left wing media (that&#039;s almost all of the mainstream outlets) down a few notches. An obviously biased review would play into such a governments sights. Is the BBC like a deer in the headlights or a fox ready to bolt for cover?.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice one but will it be a cover-up or not? The elections coming, labours likely to loose. The BBC will face a Conservative parliament that&#8217;s just looking for an excuse to take the left wing media (that&#8217;s almost all of the mainstream outlets) down a few notches. An obviously biased review would play into such a governments sights. Is the BBC like a deer in the headlights or a fox ready to bolt for cover?.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 4/24 queries in 0.007 seconds using disk
Object Caching 561/616 objects using disk

Served from: www.climategate.com @ 2012-02-08 22:24:23 -->
