<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Climategate Professor Phil Jones could face ten years on fraud charges</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.climategate.com/climategate-professor-phil-jones-could-face-ten-years-on-fraud-charges/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.climategate.com/climategate-professor-phil-jones-could-face-ten-years-on-fraud-charges</link>
	<description>Anthropogenic Global Warming, history&#039;s biggest scam</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:21:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.climategate.com/climategate-professor-phil-jones-could-face-ten-years-on-fraud-charges/comment-page-3#comment-7522</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 22:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climategate.com/?p=2987#comment-7522</guid>
		<description>A friend of mine believes that while there has been a decline over the last 8 years (against an otherwise upward trend, and still above the longer term average) that the rest of the science is so well supported that deniers are just jumping on a rather insignificant fact when faced by the tidal wave of otherwise solid data.  Jokes they may be in what they did, though are you denying the wider body of evidence?  or simply capitalizing like the rest of the skeptics on this lone incident?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A friend of mine believes that while there has been a decline over the last 8 years (against an otherwise upward trend, and still above the longer term average) that the rest of the science is so well supported that deniers are just jumping on a rather insignificant fact when faced by the tidal wave of otherwise solid data.  Jokes they may be in what they did, though are you denying the wider body of evidence?  or simply capitalizing like the rest of the skeptics on this lone incident?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John O'Sullivan</title>
		<link>http://www.climategate.com/climategate-professor-phil-jones-could-face-ten-years-on-fraud-charges/comment-page-3#comment-7493</link>
		<dc:creator>John O'Sullivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 12:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climategate.com/?p=2987#comment-7493</guid>
		<description>James, defamation  laws require the allegedly defamed to file suit.I&#039;ve called them out but unless they file their cause of action there&#039;s nothing more I can do other than repeat my allegations that they are crooks.  If they don&#039;t mind their characters being trashed then so be it-its fast becoming a free for all- they are a total joke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James, defamation  laws require the allegedly defamed to file suit.I&#8217;ve called them out but unless they file their cause of action there&#8217;s nothing more I can do other than repeat my allegations that they are crooks.  If they don&#8217;t mind their characters being trashed then so be it-its fast becoming a free for all- they are a total joke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.climategate.com/climategate-professor-phil-jones-could-face-ten-years-on-fraud-charges/comment-page-3#comment-7424</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 01:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climategate.com/?p=2987#comment-7424</guid>
		<description>but your happy trying to &quot;tempt just one of these alarmists fraudsters to sue me – I’d really love to fight them in court. Just like Monckton Ive called them every variation on the term for ‘fraudster, crook, liar’ etc. but still no takers. Wonder why? ; )&quot;  Why don&#039;t you stick it to them John?  Its so clearly a large scam that surely you can take down anyone!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but your happy trying to &#8220;tempt just one of these alarmists fraudsters to sue me – I’d really love to fight them in court. Just like Monckton Ive called them every variation on the term for ‘fraudster, crook, liar’ etc. but still no takers. Wonder why? ; )&#8221;  Why don&#8217;t you stick it to them John?  Its so clearly a large scam that surely you can take down anyone!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prosecuting climate fraud: The international dimension &#124; GORE LIED</title>
		<link>http://www.climategate.com/climategate-professor-phil-jones-could-face-ten-years-on-fraud-charges/comment-page-3#comment-5134</link>
		<dc:creator>Prosecuting climate fraud: The international dimension &#124; GORE LIED</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 06:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climategate.com/?p=2987#comment-5134</guid>
		<description>[...] fraud against Professor Phil Jones of the UK’s Climatic Research Unit under the Fraud Act (2006) here and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] fraud against Professor Phil Jones of the UK’s Climatic Research Unit under the Fraud Act (2006) here and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rush Limbaugh entertains the question: 'Isn't there some way to bring people like Al Gore up on charges of fraud?' &#124; GORE LIED</title>
		<link>http://www.climategate.com/climategate-professor-phil-jones-could-face-ten-years-on-fraud-charges/comment-page-3#comment-4736</link>
		<dc:creator>Rush Limbaugh entertains the question: 'Isn't there some way to bring people like Al Gore up on charges of fraud?' &#124; GORE LIED</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 07:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climategate.com/?p=2987#comment-4736</guid>
		<description>[...] John O&#8217;Sullivan of Climategate.com recently penned a post suggesting that the disgraced director of CRU, Phil Jones, faced up to ten years years in prison if he is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] John O&#8217;Sullivan of Climategate.com recently penned a post suggesting that the disgraced director of CRU, Phil Jones, faced up to ten years years in prison if he is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MORE from Lazarowicz! &#171; Earthlinggb&#39;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.climategate.com/climategate-professor-phil-jones-could-face-ten-years-on-fraud-charges/comment-page-3#comment-4208</link>
		<dc:creator>MORE from Lazarowicz! &#171; Earthlinggb&#39;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 01:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climategate.com/?p=2987#comment-4208</guid>
		<description>[...] &gt; &gt; Phil Jones &#8211; climategate-professor-phil-jones-could-face-ten-years-on-fraud-charges#comments [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &gt; &gt; Phil Jones &#8211; climategate-professor-phil-jones-could-face-ten-years-on-fraud-charges#comments [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Archie</title>
		<link>http://www.climategate.com/climategate-professor-phil-jones-could-face-ten-years-on-fraud-charges/comment-page-2#comment-2739</link>
		<dc:creator>Archie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 10:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climategate.com/?p=2987#comment-2739</guid>
		<description>Paranoid piffle...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paranoid piffle&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jun</title>
		<link>http://www.climategate.com/climategate-professor-phil-jones-could-face-ten-years-on-fraud-charges/comment-page-3#comment-2696</link>
		<dc:creator>jun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 01:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climategate.com/?p=2987#comment-2696</guid>
		<description>So Mr Jones is to be &#039;the scapegoat &#039;for the government ????? It will be reported in the media that all sorts of terrible things are going to happen to him................and then the sands of time will magically melt it all away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Mr Jones is to be &#8216;the scapegoat &#8216;for the government ????? It will be reported in the media that all sorts of terrible things are going to happen to him&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.and then the sands of time will magically melt it all away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Archie</title>
		<link>http://www.climategate.com/climategate-professor-phil-jones-could-face-ten-years-on-fraud-charges/comment-page-2#comment-2550</link>
		<dc:creator>Archie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 23:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climategate.com/?p=2987#comment-2550</guid>
		<description>Possibly because suing for defamation is extremely expensive and if you are not particularly wealthy they might not get their costs paid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Possibly because suing for defamation is extremely expensive and if you are not particularly wealthy they might not get their costs paid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Archie</title>
		<link>http://www.climategate.com/climategate-professor-phil-jones-could-face-ten-years-on-fraud-charges/comment-page-2#comment-2549</link>
		<dc:creator>Archie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 23:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climategate.com/?p=2987#comment-2549</guid>
		<description>There is no offence of &#039;conspiracy to corrupt&#039; contrary to the Criminal Law Act 1977. However, conspiracy to commit fraud is an offence contrary to s1 and conspiracy to defraud is an offence contrary to common law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no offence of &#8216;conspiracy to corrupt&#8217; contrary to the Criminal Law Act 1977. However, conspiracy to commit fraud is an offence contrary to s1 and conspiracy to defraud is an offence contrary to common law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 3/30 queries in 0.013 seconds using disk
Object Caching 565/632 objects using disk

Served from: www.climategate.com @ 2012-02-08 23:51:51 -->
