28
Feb

House democrats not happy with the EPA

An article in the New York Times Friday said the EPA is overstepping their bounds with their new finding about CO2 and are attempting to do an end run around Congress.  It is a blatant move that usurps Congressional powers, so blatant that even Democrats are stepping up to the plate to put an end to this.

Two top House Democrats introduced a measure yesterday aimed at blocking U.S. EPA’s authority to regulate greenhouse gases, mirroring the controversial effort launched on the Senate side by Alaska Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski.

The measure from Agriculture Chairman Collin Peterson (Minn.) and Missouri’s Ike Skelton was also co-sponsored by Missouri Republican Jo Ann Emerson. Their resolution (pdf)aims to use the Congressional Review Act to effectively veto EPA’s finding that greenhouse gases endanger human health and welfare.

“When Congress passed the Clean Air Act, it never gave EPA the explicit authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions for the purpose of stopping global climate change,” Skelton said in a statement. “But, that is exactly what EPA has proposed to do.”

Democrats Travis Childers of Mississippi and Charlie Wilson of Ohio signed on as co-sponsors after the measure was introduced, Skelton spokesman William Chapman said.

But many observers say efforts to block EPA using the Congressional Review Act would face a tough battle clearing the Democratic-led Congress and would face a veto from President Obama.

This all sounds good, but the reality of the situation is you have a President who still believes in Anthropogenic Global Warming and many Democrats in both the House and Senate who feel the same way:

“Right now, this is a symbolic act by these House members,” Weiss said. Even if they somehow got a vote in the House and cleared the Senate, the president would veto the measure, and proponents are not going to get the two-thirds majority needed, he added.

There are other moves afoot to stop the EPA:

Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.) announced last week that he will introduce a more limited legislative plan that would delay EPA’s stationary source regulations for six to 12 months beyond what the agency is planning.

And in the House, Rep. Earl Pomeroy (D-N.D.) has introduced a bill(pdf) to strip EPA of its authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions unless it receives explicit authority to do so by Congress.

I sincerely hope that the Congress will awaken and see the EPA’s move for what it is, which is another power grab by a government agency.

I am happy to see that the MSM is starting to see there is a problem and starting to report on these things.

Possibly related posts:

  1. Senior U.S. House members go after EPA CO2 limits
  2. The dominoes are falling: ConocoPhillips, BP, Caterpillar to quit Climate Group
  3. Senate seeks to can EPA’s “CO2 is a pollutant” regulation
  4. BREAKING! 101 Member Congressional Junket to Copenhagen cost taxpayers a fortune — and took 3 military planes, plus commercial seats!
  5. Copenhagen climate summit: Barack Obama given power to cut greenhouse gases

5 Responses to “House democrats not happy with the EPA”

  1. Tom Roe says:

    Although I agree that this is an important development I have to disagree on the NYT reporting it as a “problem” I see them reporting an event without the usual built in bias. The EPA will surely lose this one in court long before the Congress musters the will to act legislatively. Still, we need every horse we can get to pull the wagon up a very steep hill.

  2. william says:

    what does it take to stop carbon credits, epa, they just keep growing more and more tentacles.

    china is suddenly looking like a great place to be.

  3. PaulsNZ says:

    The choice is simple democracy and realism or Pseudo Science Socialist dictatorship.

  4. Graham says:

    The problem is that by constantly side-stepping-democracy and using every ‘trick’ and lie to push this money guzzling scam through the democratic process, these politicians and scientists are merely reinstating the Stalinist state that has only just crumbled.

    Though I know little of US politics, I think that Obama is taking a major risk to appear to be operating as a dictator, and he could be sealing the end of his Presidency.

This website is for sale for $10,000. Contact us if interested.