Feb
Independent Climate Change Email Inquiry is certainly not independent-5px
Malcolm Shykles posted the following comment on our “Submit your tips” page, and thought it was worthy of sharing on the front page.
The Independent Climate Change Email Inquiry gives links to:
The Royal Society
The Met Office
Directgov
BBC Weather
Wikipedia
All of the above sites strongly endorse Anthropogenic Global Warming
The BBC gives out a totally misleading explanation of the greenhouse effect by failing to explain that water vapour also needs to be present. The other sites are also strongly biased in favour and hardly point out that it is an unproven theory.
Also in “Classic Chemistry Demonstrations” published by the Royal Society in 1995, an experiment which is supposed to demonstrate the Greenhouse Effect only appears to work, but is reliant on CO2 being 1½ times heavier than air. Carbon dioxide heated in a beaker via an infra red lamp will get hot because its density is too high to get convection going in an atmosphere of air. The equivalent beaker of air stays cool.
The only reliable data can come from space and the only non NASA paper utilising data from space is from the Russian segment of the International Space Station. And here it says: “The increase in greenhouse gases concentration is not the reason of global warming, but on the contrary, the result of the rise of temperature caused by prolonged increase in the TSI.” (total solar irradiance)
Therefore the Independent Climate Change Email Inquiry is certainly not independent. It is a total waste of effort.
Possibly related posts:
- Royal Statistical Society join Chemist and Physicists lecturing the University of East Anglia on non-disclosure
- A reader question regarding USHCN sites
- Now satellite radiation data debunks global warming theory
- Penn State’s inquiry into Michael Mann advances to an investigation
- Climategate inquiry under way
ALLOW ME TO PPOST THIS COMMENT HERE AS WELL:
This band of Whitewash Wizards have begun to unband even before they can do any more harm is excellent news.Climate-Science-Fiction will now be recognised as such and the backers as Climate-Fictionalists.
Think for a moment “Climate Change” ruse has brought so many changes in many other spheres of our understanding how the World works and what part the crooks and the fraudsters play in it and how they have positioned themselves to benefit themselves and their cohorts to the exclusion of most of Humankind.
Any entity connected to the UN must be looked upon with extreme suspicion for it is obvious the UN CAN BE and HAS BEEN MOULDED to benefit very few and to harm many.
Taruni. To further illustrate the scope and hutzpah of the fraud in then local paper today we had a General writing to say “global warming happening faster than scientists expected and it’s a major security issue” He’s either an idiot or a liar. I suspect some of both.
Which is contrary to Jones’ admission that in the last 15 years there has been no significant warming!.. How can the science be “settled” when even the bed-wetters disagree?!
We should always be very careful when they roll out the “national security” argument. It’s often the very last refuge of real scoundrels.