2
Mar

IPCC Gets a Solid “F” in WSJ Poll

At least some American media is paying attention to Climategate. But, according to a recent poll, maybe we don’t have to worry about people getting the news. A Wall Street Journal poll asks:

“How would you grade the work of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change?”

As of 9:05 AM PST 2/28/10 they are graded as follows:

F = 81.3%

D = 12.1%

C = 2%

B = 1.8%

A = 2.8%

The D’s and F’s add up to 93.4% who think their work was sub-par.

Sounds like proof that you can fool some of the people all of the time, but you can’t fool all of the people all of the time.

Source: Wall Street Journal

Possibly related posts:

  1. Scientists behaving badly as the scandals grow
  2. Michael Mann’s WSJ Letter to the Editor:
    Science Must Be Unpolluted by Politics
  3. Founder of Wikipedia lectures you on your online manners
  4. Climategate lands on WSJ’s front page
  5. The funniest joke no one ever tells: Enron helped develop the Carbon Trading Scheme

3 Responses to “IPCC Gets a Solid “F” in WSJ Poll”

  1. DougS says:

    I’m assuming that “F”= FAIL and “D”= atrociously bad, if so they’re still being a bit generous.

    The 6.6% who gave A, B and C must be vested interests!

  2. Tom Arnold. says:

    I fear my opinion of the IPCC is completely unprintable.
    And in my estimation if I were marking their efforts, I would think the student/s was being downright facetious and I would not award any marks whatsoever.
    Because any scientist can note immediately, the outrageous claims and implausible timescales – Himalayan glaciers to melt in 35 yrs………Heavens above it’s all b******* science and I’ve read more convincing, and more cogently argued conjecture in books by Larry Niven and Jerry Pournelle even Stephen King et al.

  3. Graham says:

    I guess the alphabet isn’t long enough to get a similar report for the University of East Anglia, and speaking as a Brit, I am thoroughly ashamed that, when the only thing we have to be proud about is our integrity, we have such a shameful example spread over the global media.

    It doesn’t matter what the result of the inquiry is, no scientist with self-respect or a reputation they care about, will wish to be associated with them. You can fix many things, but a reputation isn’t one of them.