Feb
Mission Impossible: Russian spies and American money
Were the University of East Anglia emails hacked or the result of inside leak? The UK Telegraph reports that Sir David King, who for seven years was Tony Blair’s foremost scientific adviser, said the “extraordinarily sophisticated” hacking job was most likely an intelligence operation by foreign spies. Not only that, he says the most likely culprit is the Russians…and the Americans…he guesses.
In his interview with the UK’s Independent, King “guesses” that “If it was a job done on behalf of a government, then I suppose there is the possibility that it could be the Russian intelligence agency. ”
But that’s not all–he also guesses that the American lobby system was a “very likely source of finance” for the hack and that “the finger must point to them.”
While we believe the Russians are technically and organizationally capable of pulling this off, we doubt the American intelligence system that has been pussified by the democrats over the years could do anything like this, unless perhaps stimulus money was involved, or course.
King and the rest of the Warmist Deniers are determined to keep the public looking in the wrong direction. It really does not matter one iota whether the e-mails were hacked or leaked.
What DOES matter is what they contain, especially the contemporaneous notes in the computer codes.
Does it not seem that all the scammers, government-funded operatives and vested interest organisations are attempting every which way to keep the money steams running?
Well, as a headline, “The Dam is cracking” is a Preamble only. Perhaps these scammers [truth deniers] should remember the Berlin Wall and what democracy finally achieved there. And then the likes of Mr. King will have nothing behind which to hide and will receive their just desserts. His current pontification is hollow.
I believe climate change happens but I also know that it is all part of the integrated complicated survival mechanism intrinsic to our planet, something Mr. King seems short on recognising [I do not recognise 'Sir' on people who have done absolutely nothing for mankind or the people - being a fawning sycophant is no recommendation for such an unearnt title].
Does the method of unravelling the truth really matter?
If it was Russian and/or American intelligence, I would simply ask them why they could not have done it earlier. It would have shortened the period in which the green warmists could have applied, through political illiteracy and greed, destructive doctrines to our planet. We have now to recover that destruction and Mr. King was one of the men responsible for it.
Is there a full list of truth deniers? We can then chase them like the animals responsible for the Holocaust or the war in Iraq.
Strong words I know, but the only vested interest I hold is leaving a fully living planet for my children and their eventual offspring.
See how ridiculous King is:t http://noconsensus.wordpress.com/2010/02/02/uea-files-were-on-a-single-server/#more-7859
This is just more evident of the quality of scientist that speaks on these matters for the government. I don’t think his specialty was computing I recall.
Weeks ago I read a very detailed and unbiased examination of the e-mails and headers, and without any problem it was proven beyond any reasonable doubt that the mails were either made available by an insider, or held on an insecure server, From the arguments for each alternative I am in no doubt it was the former.
It seems that there is a proliferation of scientists with ambition exceeding their abilities in the UK. I’m from the UK, so I don’t feel proud to say this.