<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are we dreaming? New York Times takes on Pachauri.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.climategate.com/new-york-times-takes-on-pachauri/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.climategate.com/new-york-times-takes-on-pachauri</link>
	<description>Anthropogenic Global Warming, history&#039;s biggest scam</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:21:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.climategate.com/new-york-times-takes-on-pachauri/comment-page-1#comment-3619</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 15:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climategate.com/?p=3816#comment-3619</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d say this article is about 70% for him and only 30% against. They do their part to defend him quite a bit. For example:

&quot;The panel was also criticized for citing a study about financial losses after extreme weather events that found an increase in such losses of 2 percent a year from 1970 to 2005. That study had not been peer reviewed at the time, although it was later on.&quot;

They forgot to mention how later on it was reviewed and the author retracted it, saying there was no conclusive evidence for global warming causing said disasters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say this article is about 70% for him and only 30% against. They do their part to defend him quite a bit. For example:</p>
<p>&#8220;The panel was also criticized for citing a study about financial losses after extreme weather events that found an increase in such losses of 2 percent a year from 1970 to 2005. That study had not been peer reviewed at the time, although it was later on.&#8221;</p>
<p>They forgot to mention how later on it was reviewed and the author retracted it, saying there was no conclusive evidence for global warming causing said disasters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taruni</title>
		<link>http://www.climategate.com/new-york-times-takes-on-pachauri/comment-page-1#comment-3582</link>
		<dc:creator>Taruni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 05:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climategate.com/?p=3816#comment-3582</guid>
		<description>Lies and fabrications pushed them readers away! Maybe truth once in a while may fool them and draw them back? Dont hold your breath.Bye Bye NYT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lies and fabrications pushed them readers away! Maybe truth once in a while may fool them and draw them back? Dont hold your breath.Bye Bye NYT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taruni</title>
		<link>http://www.climategate.com/new-york-times-takes-on-pachauri/comment-page-1#comment-3581</link>
		<dc:creator>Taruni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 05:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climategate.com/?p=3816#comment-3581</guid>
		<description>Lies pushed them readers away! Maybe truth once in a while may fool them and draw them back? Dont hold your breath.Bye Bye NYT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lies pushed them readers away! Maybe truth once in a while may fool them and draw them back? Dont hold your breath.Bye Bye NYT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/11 queries in 0.004 seconds using disk
Object Caching 421/424 objects using disk

Served from: www.climategate.com @ 2012-02-08 13:07:10 -->
