Feb
Pachauri concludes an “orchestration” is going on
Rajendra Pachauri, in an interview with Amy Kazmin in New Delhi on February 3 comments on how everyone seems to be ganging up on him:
“It doesn’t take a genius to arrive at the conclusion that apparently this is carefully orchestrated.”
He does have a point, something is going on. It’s called an awakening. And the only orchestration on the skeptical side consists of a sweeping baton that cues a new story, the rhythmic word of mouth traveling down the climate vine, and the crescendo of hope skeptics feel when a resignation is asked for. But his desperation becomes apparent when he says:
I don’t want to get down to a personal level, but all you need to do is look at their backgrounds. They are people who deny the link between smoking and cancer; they are people who say that asbestos is as good as talcum powder – I hope that they apply it to their faces every day – and people who say that the only way to deal with HIV/Aids is to screen the population on a regular basis and isolate those who are infected.
That is a bold statement, Mr Pachauri. What kind of evidence do you have that skeptics don’t see the link between smoking and cancer? Do you really think some of us powder our bodies with talcum while we have a smoke instead of vitamins. You probably also think we all have gun racks in the back of our pickup trucks.
It’s only a surmise. I have no evidence. But there is enough documentary evidence to show that, for instance, in Washington DC, the number of lobbyists (trying to influence US climate change policy) has increased many fold and from what I read from the Centre for Public Integrity, 770 companies are supporting some of these lobbyists. And certainly some of them are active on the other side of the Atlantic as well.
The presumption is since these people are spending so much time trying to write all kinds of malicious articles and indulge in invective, there would probably be some resources that are flowing to them. It’s all part of a pattern. But let me clarify. I have no proof. I can only presume something like this is at work.
Ah, the amount of substantial backing you put into that statement seems about up to par with your reports, don’t you think? And, by the way, we think you know a few things about resources flowing into companies based on false information.
Source: FT
OK! Let’s point the fickle finger of fate at the deniers and just completely forget you are a scumbag Pachauri. While you’re at it lets make sure we make them sound like products of inter-marriage from trailer parks in Arkansas who have appeared on The Jerry Springer Show.
I would add that this conclusion of his is about as good as his conclusions about AGW, i.e., worthless.
It’s called people don’t like being lied to, scammed or taxed to death over non-existent “problems”. He greatly underestimates the general public. The US, Britain, Austraila, New Zealand, etc., are not 3rd world countries where the general population is uneducated like in India.
Just another pawn in the conspiracy.
http://euro-med.dk/?p=11956
http://euro-med.dk/?p=56
And I believe the the AGW proponents are in reality aliens from Planet Gore who want to colonize earth and turn its climate into one to there liking. It’s only a surmise. I have no evidence.
This all started the day that Al Gore purposely lost the 2000 presidential election in order to assume the mantle of Envionmentalist-In-Chief. But let me clarify. I have no proof. I can only presume something like this is at work.
Pachauri says “carefully orchestrated” like it is a bad thing.
If he’s able to recognise when something is carefully orchestrated, he might like to explain why AR4 wasn’t.
If the lead player in the other massive scam-H1N1 pandemic from which the New World Order was trying to save the Africans and the Asians and similar beings-Chief of the WHO were to hand in her resignation it will set an admirable example to the Chief IPCC honcho to resign as well.
By the way has she had her H1N1 shot yet?
Does anyone know anything about this man other that his job and his links with other organizations?
What kind of car(s) does he have? Where does he live when at home? where does he live when on IPCC business?
I don’t know where to find this information, but I would like to know.
Having just read the above I would like to make it clear that I don’t intend to visit him, I just wonder if he practices what he preaches
It actually sounds like he’s finally found something he does have some expertise on! A carefully orchestrated, worldwide plan, featuring people with a lot of free time on their hands due to their receipt of undeserving money from suspicious benefactors, and all this divined with no proof.
Sounds like what he, the CRU, Michael Mann and… well I guess we’ll never know just how many of them are involved, but I’m guessing that the exact number will come as a shock to people all around the world.