Jan
Penn State’s paper spreads the word on ex-CIA agent going after Michael Mann
Come on, who's not going to trust this face?
Collegian staff writer Colleen Boyle this week wrote the fair and balanced story “Agent looking for ‘Climategate’ insiders.”
What does Mann have to say about former CIA agent Kent Clizbe sending emails to 27 Penn State faculty members last week? His quote from the article:
Mann said he had no comment on Clizbe’s actions, saying “I don’t want to dignify it with a response.”
Aha, more openness from the climate change regime.
And we see that fellow Professor Alley has got Mann’s back:
Penn State Professor Richard Alley, who assisted the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and shared the 2007 Nobel Prize with Al Gore, doesn’t feel Clizbe’s e-mails will have an effect on Penn State’s scientific community — such ethical standards are already in place, he said. Alley did not comment on whether he received an e-mail from Clizbe.
“I strongly endorse high ethical standards and am very favorably impressed by the high ethical standards I see in action across our scientific community, specifically including colleagues at Penn State,” he said.
We should all heed Alley’s words–after all, he’s obviously must be as honest and bright as his co-recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize, Al Gore.
I live in a part of North America (BC) that has a Carbon Tax in place, put in place by one of the most corrupt governments in North America ie; BC Liberal partry. And Mr Mann’s response has a very familar ring to it.
Anyhoo.. doing some digging around about carbon taxes on fuel I came across a “think tank group” that supply our government with thoughts. They have found the tax on fuel bought is not supplying a good enough funding flow and want to change the tax to miles driven to increase said funding flow.
At the same time the results for 2009 carbon emissions have shown a net increase in emissions for BC under the carbon tax regime. In a province that’s going full tilt on mining gas drilling pipelines and construction the timeline predicts ever increasing carbon output for decades to come. The kicker is the population has to pay the corporations get decreased taxation and refunds from the government in question and you know the general population can’t put it together they pay the tax thinking they are making a difference?
A quote from our fearless leader says it all “The best part of my job is I get to write the laws”.
I don’t want my MTV I want my carbon taxes refunded like yesterday.
All these “scientists” at Penn State ,Hadley East Anglia etc. are all in the scam together.
If one falls,they all fall,although some will be not as involved but Know the score!.
Let the truth in good science shame them, The greatest problem is the career politicians in positions of power who are using [false] climate change to advance Their agenda to Tax the Industrialised world into building Their idea of a Marxist Utopia.
The end game of this stategy will be to remove industry from the high cost “west” to the low cost newly industrialised nations.
Stagnation in the west with falling incomes,rising standards in the East.
On the back of these events are the money- mongers and politicians with a visard of progressivnes hiding their socialist aims.
This post is just too goofy for words.
I will tell you what’s goofy mate, is people that believe that we should tax a harmless gas called CO2 because it is changing the climate. GET A LIFE! How many times throughout earth’s history has the climate changed and by how much? remember the ice ages? How much carbon were humans putting into the atmosphere to cause them to come to an end. We have only had 150 years of temperature records and that is enough to base global warming on? And I will tell you what’s goofy is that only dopey leftist, socialist wannabes believe the crap.
this clown is still working for Penn State?
Phil Jones can be prosecuted and I hope he is.
U N chief of IPCC looks like will be leaving, hopefully prosecuted.
and more liars and con artists like the little “Mann” will be next.