Comments on: Raingate splashes across the London Times

By: ADE

ADE — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 08:57:16 +0000

All these so called ERRORS ,misprints ,mistakes,are actually deliberate attempts to introduce a climate of Uncertainty and Fear in the public ,to make them quiescent to the warming agenda

By: Sam

Sam — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 08:38:31 +0000

Isn’t there anyone out there that can fire this guy? He has shown himself to be inept on many an occasion. I don’t agree with the ad hominem attacks on him, however, they make the argument against him seem less credible. If he wants to make a porn novel, he can. That has nothing to do with his “scientific” research. People usually only make ad hominem attacks when they don’t have much to go with. Politicians do this a lot. In his case there’s no need. There are way too many mistakes relevant to his work he’s screwed up on. We don’t really need anything personal to attack him on, there’s enough out there already.

By: Tom Roe

Tom Roe — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 19:24:13 +0000

Since the concensus response to climategate by the greenwiener choir was a booming incantation of “it’s all based on peer reviewed science” we should have lots of video to play with. I’ll bet we have some of the most vocal deniers out there shouting peer review in early December 2009. That footage would make a nice fast paced sequence leading to-except when it’s not and an explanation of the various gates since. Based on personal observation and a little on polling data I would say we have properly reintroduced doubt into many minds regarding global warming. That is a great accomplishment on behalf of scioence and every person on the planet. Listening again, people are ready to be shown the evidence that they alarmists are the true deniers and low-life liars. I’ve said it before… it’s 1989 all over again.

By: Taruni

Taruni — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 17:51:46 +0000

These patheticos who have been repeatedly proved to be dishonest liars only interested in feathering their own nests and have been shown to have no regard for the harm they do to mankind are still clinging to power.
One of the conclusions to be drawn from this is as long as their resignation is not DEMANDED by the 5 countries-US,England,Australia,New Zealand and Canada- which are the strongest supporters of NEW WORLD ORDER-Raj and Banki feel well protected because they were toeing the line of their powerful and wealthy masters.
Is there a procedure for removing Banki from UN so his bunkum ceases to find a world audience.
DISSOLVE THE UN THE SUBSERVIENT AND SUBVERSIVE BODY ACTING AGAINST THE INTERESTS OF THE MAJORITY OF WORLD POPULATION.