Climategate.com apologizes for having to pull this article soon after publication, for a day, to make some corrections that to errors that were made to Dr. Jan Zeman’s original text during the editing process. We’ve re-edited it with a lighter hand, and are re-releasing it now (2/21/10). Climategate.com takes full responsibility for any problems we [...]
I can report that NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS), the American version of the UK’s Climatic Research Unit (CRU) is now caught up in its own Climategate-style data fraud. We now bring you “Australiagate.” Without any rational or scientific justification GISS has altered records from ground thermometer stations to create a fictitious two-degree warming trend in northeast Australia.
We’ve now learned that there has been more shameful cherry picking of temperature stations in Canada where, since the 1970s, the number of local stations included in the U.S. government’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) database has dropped from 600 stations to only 35 stations today. And, the really shocking statistic is that the now discredited Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is taking data from only one of 100 reliable weather stations inside the Arctic Circle.
Let’s have a closer look at the character and motives of the man in charge of NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS), Dr James Hansen and if we should trust his temperature records.
Smith and D’Aleo accuse the NOAA, NCDC and GISS of manipulating temperature data to give the appearance of warmer temperatures than actually occurred by trimming the number and location of weather observation stations.