Comments on: Texas to challenge EPA CO2 finding http://www.climategate.com/texas-to-challenge-epa-co2-finding Anthropogenic Global Warming, history's biggest scam Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:21:11 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4 By: I LOVE CO2 http://www.climategate.com/texas-to-challenge-epa-co2-finding/comment-page-1#comment-4648 I LOVE CO2 Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:26:10 +0000 http://www.climategate.com/?p=4175#comment-4648 we wrote this email to the NobelPriceCommitee and world wide media: In 2007 you awarded the Nobel Peace Prize to the IPPC and Albert Arnold Gore for their efforts about the climate protection. Demonstrably, data was manipulated or even falsified. Don’t you think it is your duty to verify the award of this famous and most honorable prize again? Due to the knowledge that was obtained by the climate gate or by the glacier gate, your reputation would suffer enormously, if you covered it up in silence. Let the public know, that this award is not arbitrary and therefore unimportant and that the Laureates are most honorable. Here come the first reactions: NYPost The other main organ of the climate “consensus” is the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. It won the Nobel Peace Prize for its 2007 report — which turns out to have been so riddled with errors it could have been researched on Wikipedia. Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/warming_meltdown_iD1hypJAstOrvovafbIbGK#ixzz0fk4PeTwC [2] FTD Financial Times Germany: Nobel Price Judge going into distance to the IPCC Cause of HimalayaGate the chief of the royalswedishacademy claims a strict inspection of the gremium and CONSEQUENCES!!! http://www.infokriegernews.de/wordpress/2010/02/17/friedensnobelpreis-al-gore-und-ipcc-muessen-zittern/ ;-) we wrote this email to the NobelPriceCommitee and world wide media:

In 2007 you awarded the Nobel Peace Prize to the IPPC and Albert Arnold Gore for their efforts about the climate protection. Demonstrably, data was manipulated or even falsified.

Don’t you think it is your duty to verify the award of this famous and most honorable prize again? Due to the knowledge that was obtained by the climate gate or by the glacier gate, your reputation would suffer enormously, if you covered it up in silence.
Let the public know, that this award is not arbitrary and therefore unimportant and that the Laureates are most honorable.

Here come the first reactions: NYPost

The other main organ of the climate “consensus” is the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. It won the Nobel Peace Prize for its 2007 report — which turns out to have been so riddled with errors it could have been researched on Wikipedia.

Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/warming_meltdown_iD1hypJAstOrvovafbIbGK#ixzz0fk4PeTwC [2]

FTD Financial Times Germany:
Nobel Price Judge going into distance to the IPCC

Cause of HimalayaGate the chief of the royalswedishacademy claims a strict inspection of the gremium and CONSEQUENCES!!!

http://www.infokriegernews.de/wordpress/2010/02/17/friedensnobelpreis-al-gore-und-ipcc-muessen-zittern/

;-)

]]> By: yaosxx http://www.climategate.com/texas-to-challenge-epa-co2-finding/comment-page-1#comment-4633 yaosxx Wed, 17 Feb 2010 10:12:30 +0000 http://www.climategate.com/?p=4175#comment-4633 Go for it Texas! Go for it Texas!

]]> By: Xao Ping Wang http://www.climategate.com/texas-to-challenge-epa-co2-finding/comment-page-1#comment-4627 Xao Ping Wang Wed, 17 Feb 2010 08:55:05 +0000 http://www.climategate.com/?p=4175#comment-4627 I'm a certified AGW skeptic. So don't misconstrue my post ... One must question the motivation here. Sure, as opponents of AGW and any cap-and-trade, we would like to think that Texas is standing with us against the apostasy of the AGW myth. But if ClimateGate has taught us anything, it is that money talks. I'm sure that Texas is riding the wave of carbon cynicism and opposing legislation that is going to cost them a lot of money in the long term, especially if those figures are correct that they are the 7th largest emitter of CO2. Agree? I’m a certified AGW skeptic. So don’t misconstrue my post …

One must question the motivation here. Sure, as opponents of AGW and any cap-and-trade, we would like to think that Texas is standing with us against the apostasy of the AGW myth. But if ClimateGate has taught us anything, it is that money talks. I’m sure that Texas is riding the wave of carbon cynicism and opposing legislation that is going to cost them a lot of money in the long term, especially if those figures are correct that they are the 7th largest emitter of CO2.

Agree?

]]>